Obama Blocked From Registering For Alabama State Primary Until Eligibility Is Validated By Court


UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.

Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to “prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings.”

The deadline for any candidate to register to appear on the Alabama Presidential Primary ballot is just days away, but by agreeing to hear the case, the Alabama Courts have effectively stalled any efforts by the Democratic Party to place Obama on the ballot.

Just as important is the fact that the Court did indeed accept the case. By agreeing to hear the case, the Court appears to have recognized that the defendants, ordinary Alabama citizens, do in fact have standing. In many previous eligibility cases, courts have ruled that ordinary citizens did not have standing, in other words were not sufficiently harmed by the actions of the defendant and therefore had no legal right to bring their case before the courts.

The actions of this Alabama Court is a game changer in that the legal system has finally recognized that ordinary citizens CAN be harmed and DO have the right to protest unconstitutional actions committed at the highest levels of Federal government.

This case could revolutionize the legal system AND return the judiciary to the duty our Founding Fathers intended – protecting the citizenry from Federal power mongering.

As we have said for so long, the power to defeat the Usurper in Chief lies with the STATES. We MUST continue to push all the other states to DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE evidence of eligibility from any Presidential candidate who desires to appear on State ballots.

CONTINUED HERE AT THE SOURCE!

Advertisements

11 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

11 responses to “Obama Blocked From Registering For Alabama State Primary Until Eligibility Is Validated By Court

  1. Hasn’t the court folded on this already and will allow Obummer on the ballot. Fear, everyone is afraid of this man. There is no law and no truth in America. It has been killed by this administration.

  2. Too bad the courts don’t join in your Tea Bagger fantasy. Here’s what the Georgia court had to say in the previous case you were trumpeting: http://www.fox19.com/story/16674075/president-obama-free-to-run-for-president-in-georgia The legal analysis of the court runs along the lines I had previously sketched out for you.

    There is great political danger, folks, in living in your parallel, fact-free universe. The American electorate, or at least a clear majority of it, lives in the old, familiar one where mere assertions do not count as facts; fantasies do not count as reality and Barack Obama is not a straw man of your fashioning. You will soon enough start dealing with the real Barack Obama, his real organization and real debates, instead of the clown show that has been going on in the Republican primaries. And of course, there will be the real election. Maybe your pet billionaires can buy it, but my money is on the people. (The real people…not Tea Bagger Nation).

    • Robert, the ‘clown show’ is what has been going on in this country since Obama took office. We have spent 3 critical years going straight backwards when in fact we needed to be moving forward. He has buried this country so deeply in debt that it defies a normal persons ability to comprehend it with more …much much more to come.

      “I was impressed as never before by the utter lack of logic of the man, the scantiness of his precise knowledge of things that he was talking about, the gross inaccuracies in his statements, by the almost pathological lack of sequence in his statements, by the complete rectitude that he felt as to his own conduct, by the immense and growing egotism that come from his office, by his willingness to continue the excoriation of the press and business in order to get votes for himself, by his indifference to what effort the long continued pursuit of these ends would have upon the civilization in which he was playing a part.”

      Remember when liberals claimed Barack Obama was “probably the smartest guy ever to become president” and was “a sort of god”? Today they say “we are watching him turn into Jimmy Carter right before our eyes,” and the center point of his presidency is “a disaster.” So what changed exactly?

      Is President Obama really a different man today than he was before he entered the Oval Office? The same Illinois legislator who voted “present” 129 times is now the debt-crisis-AWOL president who refused to present a specific plan of his own. The same presidential candidate who wanted to “spread the wealth” has unleashed redistributionist, collectivist policies on everything from health care and energy supply to runaway Keynesian spending and ever-increasing taxes. Should we be surprised?

      The Obamaloid may still win re-election in 2012, of course, but in recent weeks, his approval rating has crumbled, particularly among liberals, to an all-time low of 40 percent in a recent Gallup poll. Another poll shows that even among liberal Democrats, strong support for Mr. Obama’s record on jobs has plummeted 22 points, to a paltry 31 percent. The hope and change of 2008 have given way to the joblessness and foreclosures of Obamanomics.

      The only thing worse than the abject failure of a liberal president, at least in the eyes of the liberal, is the undeniable failure of liberalism itself. To claim Mr. Obama has been a good president no longer even remotely passes the laugh test. Consider the results thus far of the Obama presidency:

      -Two million-private sector jobs have been lost.

      -Unemployment jumped from 7.8 to 9.2 percent with a simply terrible 2011 first-quarter economic growth rate of just 0.4 percent.

      -A record 1 in 7 Americans is on food stamps.

      -Gasoline prices more than doubled, from $1.83 to $3.74 per gallon.

      -National debt increased 35 percent, to $14.5 trillion, or $137,000 for each taxpayer.

      -National unfunded liabilities increased 47 percent, to $114.9 trillion, or a cool $1 million for each taxpayer (and this does not yet include Obamacare).

      -America has lost its AAA credit rating. (because of our unsustainable level of debt)

      What’s worse, and was as easily predictable, is the systematic dishonesty Team Obama unleashed to persuade Americans to tolerate its big-government, collectivist agenda. America is, after all, a center-right nation with nearly 3-to-1 self-described conservatives compared to liberals. How else besides trickery could Mr. Obama further an agenda so unpopular with voters?

      • The stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent.
      • Stimulus funds would go to “shovel-ready” jobs.
      • Obamacare would create 4 million new jobs – 400,000 almost immediately.
      • You could keep your own doctor.
      • The president’s mother was denied health insurance.
      • Obamanomics would mean a “net spending cut.”

      So, as the liberal presidency of Mr. Obama becomes increasingly indefensible, the liberal is faced with an unthinkable dilemma: acknowledge the fundamental failure of his collectivist liberal philosophy, which tends toward socialism, or blame its failures on a single man whom, until just recently, the liberal deified.
      The conflict between liberal collectivist ideology and its application was easily predictable by anyone who has studied big-government economic failures throughout history, from the collectivist all-stars including Mao’s China, Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Soviet Union to today’s honorable mentions such as Castro’s Cuba or Chavez’s Venezuela. Enforcement of collectivism has always depended on government power, from Stalin’s iron-fisted gulags to Mr. Obama’s mere heavy-handed plan for punitive fines for failure to purchase your government-imposed health insurance. The degree of autocracy may vary, but still the collectivist road to economic ruin is universal.
      Here’s what I wrote one year ago:

      “As President Obama’s failures mount, there will be an awkward reversal of roles among liberals, and to a lesser degree, among conservatives, that we’re already beginning to see. It will be the liberals, rather than the conservatives, who will decry this man as personally incompetent. In the collapse of the social-welfare state, the last bastion for these scoundrels will be to sacrifice their own anointed deity as though it is his personal failures, rather than the inherent deep flaws of statism, that are to blame. Of course, one must ask how valuable an ideology can be if one man, even (or perhaps especially) a flawed man, can destroy it.

      “Conservatives will then find themselves in the uncomfortable position of defending Barack Obama personally, or at least reminding the liberals of their earlier effusive praise, in order to redirect the blame where it primarily belongs – at the feet of the statist policies themselves. The liberals will be left to explain, of course, how valuable the liberal ideology itself really is if even a learned and godlike leader cannot manage it. Further, if Barack Obama turns out not to be the deity they once claimed, what does that say of the liberals’ perception (and honesty) when they eventually anoint another?”

      This cycle of liberal, cannibalistic personal destruction is the predictable result of the Democrats’ cult-of-personality politics. Those purveyors of big-government rule are the mob that Ann Coulter described in her recent book “Demonic,” quoting Gustave Le Bon from a century ago, that “knows neither doubt nor uncertainty … it goes at once to extremes.” The absurdity of liberals’ deification and then condemnation of their own leaders is second only to their unwillingness to confront the failures of their collectivist philosophy.

      In the end, Barack Obama’s failures as president are not because he couldn’t faithfully execute the liberal collectivist philosophy – he ushered in the Obamacare era, after all – his failures are instead because he bought into the failed philosophy in the first place

      • I read your rant, Cameron. I see that you hate the current president and blame him for everything that has gone wrong in America for the past 3 years, as well as some of the things that have gone right. I see that you hate collectivist ideas like a government of the people, by the people and for the people. You hate socialist institutions like the US Army, Navy, etc. If any of the Republicans now running for office actually gets elected, which I think is not going to happen, I would seriously think about moving to Canada. I don’t want to live in your paranoid, conspiracy driven, elitist, 1%-worshiping world. God help us all if your teabagger political views ever become mainstream, because then we are well and truly fucked as a nation. I try to imagine what life would be like under Romney, the empty suit, and I shudder. Fortunately, the President has very limited powers to really change the course of American life and Romney has no idea where he really wants to go anyway. Santorum? OMG! Gingrich and Paul have no chance whatsoever. Get ready for four more years. I don’t think that the real American people are stupid enough to opt for any of the Republican choices, when it comes right down to it. Watch Obama tear your nominee limb from limb in every debate — whoever your nominee turns out to be. Have a great weekend. 🙂

      • Robert…I LOVE a government that governs within the strict confines of it’s constitutional charter. What I hate is a government who now thinks it has a duty to mandate what religious organizations like the Catholic Charities etc. must and must not include in the health insurance benefits they offer their employees. Only the brain dead see this as a woman’s rights issue and the rest of us see it as just another governmental over reach into areas they have no place being. That’s the government and the policies of this man I donot care for. I don’t hate anyone but I don’t plan on checking my liberties at the door and surrendering myself under a shamelessly dishonest despot like bah rock!

      • only if it’s written for him on a teleprompter. What people have been told and what Obama has really done are so far apart I highly doubt his zionist wall street masters will allow him to participate in only the most controlled and choreographed environments and never without a teleprompter (the man behind the curtain)

  3. Pingback: Eligibility questions are undermining the Office of the President | Grumpy Opinions

  4. In only two days, Obama has the Catholic church agreeing with his tweaks in the mandate. It was never a “War On Religion”, of course. That’s just right wing, hysterical bullshit. It was never a decree on how to worship or a Constitutional Issue…just a labor law issue. But Cameron….holy cow…”zionist wall street masters?!” Makes you sound like a Jew Hater. And teleprompters? The President doesn’t need them…it’s just a convenience. In the coming debates there will be no teleprompter and Obama will eat your poor, pitiful candidate for lunch, because he is deeply intelligent, has an amazing memory and a way with a phrase. I would pay money to see Obama debate any of the sorry candidates left in the Republican circus. Have a large platter handy, because you’re going to get your head — or your ass — handed to you.

    • Where in the world does anyone in government think they get the required power to tell a private employer they MUST offer contraceptives in their insurance coverage?

      You won’t have to pay a dime to see it let’s both hope and pray that he is forced to leave his teleprompter at home and we get to hear him articulate what he thinks (or more likely doesn’t think) and not what David Axelrod and Co. load his lips with. Romney was admitted to all of his Ivy league schools based upon his own merits …unlike Barry Soetero who’s entire record of achievement make him nothing more than the affirmative action poster child of gross incompetence incestuously interbred with the peter principle.

    • Zionism and Judaism could not be more different ….Most Torah Jews are anti Zionists Robert. As a result anti Zionism and anti semitism are also two very different things. Although there are those who refuse to accept the teachings the Rabbis and will continue to support the Zionist state, there are also many who are totally unaware of the history of Zionism and its contradiction to the beliefs of Jews. the Zionists are not the saviors of the Jewish People and guarantors of their safety, but rather the instigators and original cause of Jewish suffering in the Holy Land and worldwide.

      The idea that Zionism and the State of “Israel” are the protector of Jews is probably the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the Jewish People. Indeed, where else since 1945 have Jews been in such physical danger as in the Zionist state?!It has been the age-old intention of Zionism to intentionally stir up anti-Semitism anywhere possible, and even more commonly, to take advantage of any Jewish suffering anywhere in order to enhance its cause.

      Hatred of Jews and Jewish suffering is the oxygen of the Zionist movement, and from the very beginning has been to deliberately incite hatred of the Jew and then, in feigned horror, use it to justify the existence of the Zionist state. Zionists regularly pull out their handy “anti-Semite” race card against anyone, Jew or non-Jew, who dares to speak out against the wickedness of Zionism

Tell me your thoughts and I will respond!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s