Generosity vs. responsibility. Can we be both?

Generosity vs. responsibility
September 26th, 2011

Check out this letter to the editor in the NY Times (via Keith Burgess-Jackson):

We can be either a generous society or a responsible society, but not both. If we are generous, we will undermine responsibility, no matter how much social democrats and progressives try to engineer social behavior.

A responsible society basically asks people to take care of themselves; it is not kind, but such a society can sustain itself and grow. A generous society cannot maintain itself and still be free. The generosity will increasingly be paid for by more and more intrusive government control of all social behavior.

Therefore, I believe we must emphasize being a responsible society and build only that generous component—welfare and charity—that will not undermine responsibility.
WILLIAM N. HOKEManhattan Beach, Calif., Sept. 16, 2011

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tell me your thoughts and I will respond!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s